In this gripping and timely episode of the J100 Podcast, host David M. Cohen speaks with John Spencer, one of the world’s leading experts on urban warfare and modern military strategy. Spencer, a retired U.S. Army officer and West Point scholar, shares powerful insights from his on-the-ground research in Gaza, his deep study of the IDF, and his analysis of the evolving face of warfare in the Middle East.
From October 7th to the Israel-Iran War, Spencer dismantles media misinformation, explores the psychological warfare of propaganda, and explains why the war against Hamas and the Iranian regime is about much more than just military objectives — it's about defending Western values and the integrity of truth itself.
Condensed Transcript
David M. Cohen: Tell us a bit about your background and how you got into studying war.
John Spencer: I grew up in Richmond, Indiana. Joined the Army after high school—25 years in active duty. I later earned a Master’s from Georgetown, worked at the Pentagon, taught at West Point, and co-founded a research center. Now, I study active and recent wars globally. Israel has been a focus of mine, and after October 7, it became personal. I saw a tidal wave of misinformation about Gaza, proportionality, and the IDF. I knew I had to speak out—truth matters.
David: That misinformation leads to real-world hate, like the "Death to the IDF" chants at recent events. What’s your take?
John: It’s disgusting. It stems from ignorance and antisemitism, masked as activism. The IDF has operated under the most intense moral scrutiny in the history of urban warfare. The global double standard toward Israel is dangerous and deeply anti-Western in its implications.
David: Let’s talk about the current state of the Gaza conflict. Many feel it’s incomplete—hostages remain, Hamas isn’t fully defeated. What’s the ideal outcome?
John: Removing Hamas from power is non-negotiable. That requires a power replacement in Gaza, perhaps through local clans or international frameworks. But wars like this don’t end quickly. You need de-radicalization and reconciliation. Israel’s made incredible progress, but it’s a generational project.
David: What about hostages complicating that?
John: Hugely. Hostage situations in urban warfare are uniquely difficult. Hamas uses them as leverage while remaining ideologically committed to Israel’s destruction. Still, Israeli society may soon prioritize hostages over the war’s broader goals. That tension is real.
David: Who's running Hamas now?
John: Most of the original leadership is dead or incapacitated. It’s splintered. Power now often lies with local strongmen who control neighborhoods through fear. Hamas as an organized structure is largely decimated, but its influence persists.
David: How did Israel miss October 7?
John: It was a catastrophic intelligence failure, but also a failure of imagination. Hamas was considered the least existential threat compared to Iran or Hezbollah. Israel over-relied on technology and misread Hamas’s intent. That cost them dearly.
David: Has Israel rebounded?
John: Absolutely. Post-October 7, Israel has systematically weakened multiple threats—Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran. It’s stronger militarily, socially, and strategically than it was on October 6.
David: What about Israel’s bold move against Iran? The so-called 12-day war?
John: Unprecedented. Israel launched a surgical, deeply sophisticated operation—Operation Rising Lion—crippling Iran’s military and nuclear infrastructure. The U.S. joined with Operation Midnight Hammer. It was historic and tactically flawless—no aircraft lost, strategic goals achieved.
David: Could any other president have pulled that off?
John: Honestly, no. President Trump’s decisiveness and boldness made that intervention possible. His leadership style allowed for rapid, high-stakes decisions with clear messaging. No other current leader likely would’ve done it.
David: And yet, media narratives seem to downplay the success.
John: That’s the frustrating part. People spin facts to serve agendas. The mission was about halting—not destroying—Iran’s nuclear program. And it did just that. Some refuse to see success unless it fits their political narrative.
David: What’s the likelihood of future threats, like a dirty bomb?
John: Always a possibility. It’s why layered security—intelligence, law enforcement, tech—is essential. You can’t let regimes like Iran even approach nuclear capabilities. Zero enrichment must remain the goal.
David: So what’s next?
John: I don’t predict. But I believe we’re entering a new era—possibly of peace—because of how dominant Israel has become. The old strategic order is shifting. We’re witnessing the birth of a new Middle East.
David: Final question—what do you do in your spare time?
John: First and foremost, I’m a father. My mission is to raise good people—individuals of character who understand duty, service, and truth.
David: Thank you, John. May we merit peace through strength.
John: Amen. Only the dead have seen the end of war—but strength can prevent it.
Share this post